TL;DR: The Credit Myth
Most California homeowners are told that a short sale is a 2-to-7-year derogatory credit “sentence” away from buying a home again. This is because Short Sales negotiated by non-attorney Realtors result in banks almost always report these accounts as “Settled for less than full balance.” However, under California Code of Civil Procedure § 580e, the law mandates a different reality. This post explores how we leverage the statute to argue for a “Paid in Full” credit status, potentially accelerating your return to homeownership.
The Statutory Hook: CCP 580e(a)(1)
In California, a short sale is not just a “deal” between you and the bank; it is a transaction governed by strict consumer protection laws. For instance CCP 580e states that if a lender provides written consent to a short sale on a 1-4 unit residential dwelling:
“…[the consent] shall obligate that holder to accept the sale proceeds as full payment and to fully discharge the remaining amount of the indebtedness…”
The Argument for “Paid in Full” Reporting
In California, the “status” of your loan is a matter of statutory mandate, not a bank’s internal notation or a clerk’s data-entry preference.
-
The Mandate: The law (CCP 580e) requires the bank to accept the proceeds as “Full Payment.”
-
The Reporting: If the bank reports the account as anything other than “Full Payment,” they are arguably providing inaccurate information to the credit bureaus.
-
The Leverage: Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), furnishers of information have a legal duty to report with “accuracy and integrity.” Reporting a “partial payment” when the law mandates “full payment” is a discrepancy we can challenge.
Practitioner Insight: The Metro 2 Battle
Banks use a standardized language called “Metro 2” to talk to credit bureaus. Most automated underwriting systems (like those used by Fannie Mae) are programmed to “reject” or “delay” any file with a code indicating a deficiency settlement.
Our Strategy: This strategy is not for everyone but for our clients who request it, we don’t just “hope” for good reporting. We demand that the bank’s internal reporting reflects the legal finality of the transaction. If we can secure Account Status Code 13 (Paid or closed account/zero balance) or the equivalent, we may be able to move your file out of the “derogatory settlement” bucket and into the “satisfied” bucket. While not guaranteed, this is a strategic play that can not be offered by non-attorney real estate agents.
People Also Ask (FAQ)
-
Q: Can the bank still report the ‘short’ amount to the IRS?
-
A: They may issue a 1099-C, but as we discuss in our Tax Pillar, the same “Full Payment” argument helps us shield that income from being taxed.
-
-
Q: Does this work for 2nd mortgages?
-
A: Yes. CCP 580e was expanded to include junior liens. If they consented to the sale, they must “fully discharge” the debt.
-
-
Q: How long does this take to fix?
-
A: This strategy can start before the sale closes or if the sale is executed properly you may wish to commence the strategy within 24 hours of the sale closing. We audit the approval letter and the final payoff demand and present to you our suggested timeline for action. You then decide if you wish to engage or have us do it.
-
Author Schema
John McConnin | john@listingattorney.com | San Diego, CA | Listing Attorney | Broker = Attorney | DRE # 01445675 and St Bar # 154852.

Leave a Reply